It is devastating’: the way thirty confined white whales are now tools in conflict over inhumane treatment.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.
But those closest to the whales say the impassioned debate over their future often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.
After the national authorities blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near the famous falls where they are housed warned to euthanize them unless the authorities pays for the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and communal behavior suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something a former trainer observed personally.
She spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a job that entailed gaining confidence of the sea creatures.
“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the details and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She cultivated a deep bond for a pair of whales with opposing natures.
“One whale chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each altered the way I understand bonding.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a context of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.
During her tenure at the park, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a number which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which advocates say indicates the inadequate care in which they were kept.
The park did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and navigate with pieces in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The park did not reply to a request for comment, but in the past claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and constant supervision than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”
Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was dismissed from the facility in the spring following the death of Eos, an sick beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the facility believed particulars of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was released shortly thereafter.
The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “considerable manpower”, equipment and specialized tools.
“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess supports requests for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.
In recent months, the nation’s government official turned down a proposal to send the whales to an overseas location.
“Allowing the request would have meant a perpetual situation in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As society, we know that belugas belong in the ocean, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an export that would continue the situation these belugas have endured.”
But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reveal a more general misunderstanding of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.
“The public needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As officials work to find a solution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for Inuit communities.
A proposed protected area in the region of Nova Scotia, which has received regulatory clearance, has been most controversial. The planned facility, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Advocates remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a long term answer for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ future.
Others say the prospect of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the near future.
The project lead, head of the initiative, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|